Sanhedrin Mediation Case: Norman & Ulf Dialogue, Moderated by Rabbi Yosef Edery

Updated: Aug 3

Sanhedrin Mediation Case: Norman and Ulf Dialogue, Moderated by Rabbi Yosef Edery

Introduction

On July 20, 2025*, Mr. Norman Willis and Mr. Ulf Diebel engaged in a formal mediation session, moderated by Hon. Rabbi Yosef Edery, under the auspices of the Sanhedrin Initiative.

The session aimed to address a decade-long conflict rooted in misunderstandings and unspoken grievances between the two parties.

Opening Statements

Norman Willis opened the dialogue acknowledging their shared spiritual pursuit—listening to the voice of Elohim—but expressed frustration at Ulf’s insistence and perceived threats

(exact details of case is discussed in the video by Morman at the end of article).

He described receiving two videos (from 2016 and 2019) that he did not fully engage with at the time and later re‑opened communication only after Ulf’s public YouTube comment resurfaced the dispute. Norman emphasized:

He felt overwhelmed by accusations—ranging from theft to murder—that lacked evidence.
He requested respectful dialogue, asking that the second video be removed if possible, and that future interactions avoid coercive language.

Mr. Ulf (Olaf) responded by outlining his understanding of three legal frameworks governing their interaction:

Biblical Law — Rooted in Torah, supported by prophetic precedent, and aligned with Acts 15.
Talmudic-Court Jurisprudence — Historically available only to Jews, limiting access to Noahides.
Canonical (Roman Catholic) Law — Alleged still binding via historical concordats and church-state entanglements.

Ulf framed his concerns around financial conduct, theological clarity, and the establishment of the nascent Sanhedrin.

He described an IRS filing linked to a $250 million valuation of Norman’s fundraising claims and raised issues about branding and messaging around “building the kingdom of Yeshua,” proposing more neutral language like “building the kingdom of Hashem.” He emphasized the need for precise terminology to avoid misrepresentation or allegations of financial misconduct.

Mediator Summary

Rabbi Yosef Edery synthesized both perspectives:

Norman seeks a working relationship free from forceful demands, insisting on respect and truth.
Ulf hopes to establish shared ground via theological and legal clarity, transparency in fundraising, and correct rhetorical framing.

Rabbi Edery highlighted key points of disagreement:

access/control of the disputed video channel, accusations of impropriety, and the rhetorical framing of spiritual missions.

Key Themes & Areas for Resolution

1. Respectful Communication

Norman insisted on a cessation of threatening or demanding language.
Ulf was open to alternative phrasing that better aligned with shared values (e.g., “kingdom of God” instead of “Yeshua’s kingdom”).

2. Rectifying Public Representations

Norman requested the removal of the second video, citing harm from mischaracterization.
Ulf explained he lacks control over the channel and is seeking technical and legal avenues to effect removal.

3. Theological Alignment

The discussion touched on foundational theology, including:

Ulf’s interpretation of the Seven Noahide Laws.
Nazarene-Christian identity versus traditional Christian trinitarian beliefs.
Ulf’s ongoing study of Yeshua’s nature, fallen watchers, and the role of the Holy Spirit.

Norman confirmed his alignment with spiritual awakening, respect for Torah, and distinction from mainstream Christian comfort.

4. Financial Messaging

Ulf questioned Norman’s labeling of fund-raising as building “Yeshua’s kingdom,” suggesting it could be misleading.

Norman agreed to prayerful consideration, indicating openness to amendments.

Next Steps

Channel Dispute: Ulf to pursue YouTube reporting by citing personal rights violation and copyright infringement.

Content Removal: Norman to advise if he will initiate a takedown; both to coordinate on resolution.

Terminology Refinement: Ulf proposed a compromise language emphasizing Torah-aligned mission; Norman will pray and consult leadership before finalizing.

Future Dialogue: Both parties expressed desire for continued mutual respect, theological clarity, and possibly joint projects under agreed terms.

Conclusion

This groundbreaking session under Sanhedrin mediation rules showcased a commitment to civil discourse rooted in biblical values. Though disagreement remains on critical theological and administrative fronts, both Norman and Ulf articulated concrete steps forward toward reconciliation. By addressing terminology, truthfulness, and mutual respect, they laid the groundwork for building a cooperative future aligned with shared beliefs and legal clarity.

*Session date referenced by Ulf during the mediation: July 20, 2025.

Mr. Norman has Released a follow up video to the Sanhedrin Mediation Case Linked Below.