Liberalism, Torah, and the Discipline of Freedom: A Comparative Analysis
- Honorable Rabbi Yosef Edery

- 2 days ago
- 4 min read
Baruch Hashem

Abstract
This paper examines the philosophical convergence and divergence between classical liberalism and Torah-based Jewish thought. While both traditions articulate a profound concern for human dignity, moral responsibility, and the pursuit of freedom, they diverge sharply on the question of the conditions under which freedom can be sustained. Liberalism tends to prioritize individual autonomy as a primary value, whereas Torah posits that freedom has ontological meaning only when bounded by divine wisdom and ethical discipline. The analysis highlights shared ideals, examines differences in practical implementation, and argues for a model of freedom rooted not in self-expression but in self-mastery.

1. Introduction
Few intellectual traditions have shaped Western moral discourse as profoundly as liberalism and Torah. Liberalism seeks to liberate the human being from coercive structures and maximize personal autonomy. Torah, by contrast, grounds freedom in the service of higher moral purpose: “I am the Lord your God who took you out of Egypt, from the house of slaves.”¹
Both traditions, in their own language, attempt to answer the same universal question:
What does it mean for a human being to be free?

2. Conceptual Convergences Between Liberalism and Torah
2.1 Human Dignity and Moral Agency
Classical liberalism assumes that every human being possesses intrinsic worth and rational capacity, deserving protection from tyranny and unjust coercion. Torah likewise affirms that the human being is tzelem Elokim, created in the Divine image, thereby endowed with dignity and moral responsibility.²
2.2 Opposition to Tyranny
Liberalism seeks to dismantle oppressive structures. Torah frames the Exodus as the paradigmatic liberation narrative.³ Freedom is a core Divine intention for humanity, not merely a political condition.
2.3 Value of Conscience and Individual Responsibility
Both systems emphasize that the moral individual must not be absorbed into collective authoritarianism. Liberalism protects conscience; Torah demands that a human being act with fear of Heaven, even against the majority: “Do not follow the multitude to do evil.”⁴
Thus, at the level of abstract principle, there is profound resonance.

3. Divergence: Freedom as Autonomy vs. Freedom as Discipline
The divergence becomes stark in practice.
3.1 Liberalism’s Autonomy Model
Liberalism presumes that individuals flourish when unrestrained, except to prevent immediate harm to others. The underlying assumption is that human beings are essentially benign and rational actors.
3.2 Torah’s Discipline Model
Torah assumes a dual nature: the nefesh haElokit (Divine soul) and the nefesh habehamit (animal soul).⁵ Because “אין אפוטרופוס לעריות” — “There is no guardian over matters of sexual temptation”⁶ — Torah insists that human passions require external guidance and internal discipline.
Freedom without structure leads not to liberation, but to enslavement by impulse.
3.3 Implementation: Liberalism’s Risk and Torah’s Safeguard
The divergence lies not in values but in practical mechanics.
• Liberalism trusts spontaneous order.
• Torah trusts cultivated order.
Where liberalism sees censorship as an affront to liberty, Torah sees it as an act of protecting human moral dignity.
This does not negate the shared ideal of freedom; it merely demonstrates a difference in the operational model of achieving it.

4. Government Intervention and Moral Protection
Judaism does not view moral regulation as oppressive. Rather, it is a public-health measure for the soul and society.

4.1 Censorship of Immorality
Given that the Talmud states that no one is immune to their passions, Torah would logically support government structures that limit exposure to morally destructive materials.⁷
Such regulation is not a violation of liberty but an affirmation of human vulnerability and value.

4.2 Substances and the Torah Method of “Sanctified Exposure”
Judaism does not fear material substances; it contextualizes them.
Wine on Shabbat:
One cup passed around educates children in moderation, respect for boundaries, and sanctified enjoyment.
Fire in Shabbat candles:
Weekly exposure teaches reverence and responsibility.
Alcohol in Farbrengen settings:
Up to four small l’chaims over several hours are permitted when the purpose is emotional openness, humility, and personal growth — not escapism.
Torah trains the human being not to eliminate desire, but to shape it into service of the good.

5. Critique of Modern Liberalism: Loss of the “Disciplines of Freedom”
The liberal revolutions of the 1960s and 70s correctly sensed that humanity should not be crushed under conformity. This was, in a sense, a secular echo of the Torah’s eternal call for freedom.
But decades later, we observe a deterioration:
Freedom has been detached from discipline, resulting in addiction, social fragmentation, and moral confusion.
Torah insists that only One is the true Master of freedom: “I am Hashem your God who brought you out….”⁸
Human beings cannot generate sustainable liberty independent of Divine instruction.

6. Judaism’s Ancient Claim: Freedom Since Creation
Unlike modern liberalism, which is historically young, Judaism has been developing a doctrine of freedom since the dawn of humanity:
• Adam is commanded — signaling that freedom is purposeful.
• Noah is given the Seven Laws — indicating universal moral freedom.
• Abraham leaves Ur — choosing a life of transcendent freedom over idolatrous determinism.
• Sinai unites a nation under Divine law — establishing freedom not as chaos but as communal covenant.
Judaism’s notion of freedom is therefore cosmic, not political.

7. Conclusion: A Blessing for True Freedom
May we, each in our own journey, learn the “discipline of freedom.”
May we uncover the freedom that comes not from unbounded choice but from clarity of purpose.
May we learn from wine, from flame, from the melody of a farbrengen — that everything in this world can become a ladder upward when guided by wisdom.
May the Holy One blessed be he, bless all who seek truth, all who long for inner redemption, and all who strive to tame the animal soul so the Divine soul may shine to overcome a be successful in their service of Hashem.
May our hearts become like vessels of fine silver — shaped, hollowed, refined — able to hold the light of genuine torah based liberty and freedom.
And may we merit soon the day when the whole world is filled with the knowledge of Hashem, and freedom is no longer an ideology or a definition awaiting unlocking, but the air that all humanity breathes.

Footnotes
Exodus 20:2.
Genesis 1:27.
See Exodus chapters 1–15.
Exodus 23:2.
Tanya, Chapter 1.
Sanhedrin 107a; Kiddushin 81a.
Ibid., principle of ein apotropus la’arayot.
Exodus 20:2.

















Comments